|
Mr. Thursday@mrthursday.bsky.social |
I'd have to see what the ruling says specifically. Most scholars were reading it the way you say, but Trump's lawyers were arguing that it meant the President can't be prosecuted unless he's impeached first.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Kaphka
@kaphka.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They were, and then the court considered and rejected that argument. I don't know how to post screenshots like the cool kids do, but you can find it in part IV-A of the opinion.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes