|
Idiot/Savant@norightturnnz.bsky.social |
I guess it can just be ignored, since CC licences require underlying copyright and last only for the duration of the copyright of the work. Or are they claiming it for the typographical copyright?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Mike Dickison
@adzebill.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Both the work and the typographic copyright had expired when that was digitised. And, yes, we humans in the know can ignore it, but most people and bots will be assuming the NLNZ is authoritative and knows what it’s doing.
2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes