's avatar

@pbergs.bsky.social

The court laid out some of the problems with the challenges, as well as some principles the lower courts can follow in order to build a better argument for later.

2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @pbergs.bsky.social
[ View ]

[Trump v. US (6-3)] It’s a split for immunity. “Core functions” of the President (appointing ambassadors, etc.) carry ABSOLUTE immunity. FORMER presidents can claim immunity for SOME official acts. No immunity can be claimed for UNofficial acts.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @pbergs.bsky.social
[ View ]

Sidenote: Basically, if successful, those challenges would have barred platforms like Facebook and YouTube from moderating posts as stipulated in such laws (read: basically those laws wanted to stop platforms from moderating alt-right and N*zi propaganda)

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes