|
Pwnallthethings@pwnallthethings.bsky.social |
The only light at the end of the tunnel for every version of this hypo, and it is a very dim one, involves that president doing the act, being charged anyway after leaving office, the government losing on TvUS grounds but appealing it back up to SCOTUS anyway, and them overruling it
3 replies 1 reposts 19 likes
|
Dave C3
@davec3.bsky.social
[ View ] |
A Constitutional amendment reversing the ruling seems similarly (un)likely
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Wait, what?
@johnnyphenomic.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What if current President decided his appointment power means he determines what constitutes “good behaviour”, takes the official act of removing 3 members of the Supreme Court for federal judicial ethics violations, and on appeal the remaining SCOTUS reconsiders absolute immunity?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Danny Hatcher
@rulingwalnut.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Sure seems like if Biden really wants to prevent future presidents from doing this his best bet is to do it himself first and have SCOTUS rule against him...
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes