|
Quinta Jurecic@qjurecic.bsky.social |
Ah but do those statutes specifically name the President
3 replies 0 reposts 12 likes
|
tom rawls
@ruckus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I'm curious if you legal guys are, at some fundamental level, gobsmacked that you're even discussing all this stuff?
1 replies 0 reposts 11 likes
|
Peter Orlowicz
@peterorlowicz.bsky.social
[ View ] |
No. One might argue that "person acting for or on behalf of the United States" includes the President, even if he is not an officer or employee, but *helpless shrug*
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Wendell Albright
@wendella.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And by NAME. If "Donald Trump" isn't in the law, it may not be applied against "Donald Trump". That's just common sense.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes