Oh, good. Another attempt at using AI to litigate. This one is (thank GOD) hypothetical. But let's see how it does.
To put it differntly:
Does Daniel know what he's talking about, or is he a tech dude in desperate need of a sense of humility and an understanding of his own limitations?
Thread.
Oh, oh, I know the answer to this one! Itโs related to him angrily yelling about how modern GPTs can do Google searches, as if thatโs some sort of ground breaking innovation.
First issue: just because you know how useful a tool is for what you do doesn't mean you have a clue whether it will help others. To know that, you need to know what they do.
Need to finish the article but as soon as I read:
โI recently became entrenched in a discussion with a large number of lawyers, but due to a communication issue, no progress was being made.โ
I immediately wondered if he is that circular login twerp from the other day or a different goal post mover
he really isnโt using the AI to litigate, heโs making up a case to hypothesize how an AI might HELP litigate, itโs totally different!
(Itโs just a different version of making up a guy to get mad at is what it is, lmao)