Very Very Common Mike Dunford 's avatar

Very Very Common Mike Dunford

@questauthority.bsky.social

Oh, good. Another attempt at using AI to litigate. This one is (thank GOD) hypothetical. But let's see how it does. To put it differntly: Does Daniel know what he's talking about, or is he a tech dude in desperate need of a sense of humility and an understanding of his own limitations? Thread.

11 replies 31 reposts 178 likes


Field Marshall Windbag's avatar Field Marshall Windbag @marshallwindbag.bsky.social
[ View ]

Lawyer here. Daniel needs to stay in his lane which he claims is being a scholar

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Joe Haydu's avatar Joe Haydu @joehaydu.bsky.social
[ View ]

Oh, oh, I know the answer to this one! Itโ€™s related to him angrily yelling about how modern GPTs can do Google searches, as if thatโ€™s some sort of ground breaking innovation.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Very Very Common Mike Dunford 's avatar Very Very Common Mike Dunford @questauthority.bsky.social
[ View ]

Here's the medium post where Daniel does his little legal hypothetical.

medium.com/technology-p...

Let's run through it.

First issue: just because you know how useful a tool is for what you do doesn't mean you have a clue whether it will help others. To know that, you need to know what they do.

6 replies 4 reposts 83 likes


Mike Dark's avatar Mike Dark @darkmich.bsky.social
[ View ]

Our Friday talk was prescient apparently. :)

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


EssayWells's avatar EssayWells @essaywells.bsky.social
[ View ]

When I found his ORCID I damn near laughed out a kidney. The perfect punchline.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Carol's avatar Carol @pinkgodzilla2.bsky.social
[ View ]

Need to finish the article but as soon as I read: โ€œI recently became entrenched in a discussion with a large number of lawyers, but due to a communication issue, no progress was being made.โ€ I immediately wondered if he is that circular login twerp from the other day or a different goal post mover

1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Daniel Goldman's avatar Daniel Goldman @dgoldman.bsky.social
[ View ]

"Using AI to litigate" is totally not what the hypothetical is. Did you read it?

3 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Meredith Rose's avatar Meredith Rose @mrose.ink
[ View ]

That sweet vindication when I already have OP muted

1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Robert Szasz ๐“…†'s avatar Robert Szasz ๐“…† @rszasz.bsky.social
[ View ]

๐Ÿ“Œ

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Robert Szasz ๐“…†'s avatar Robert Szasz ๐“…† @rszasz.bsky.social
[ View ]

In the other thread someone posted his orcid.org/0000-0003-28... and oof

Reads as " I can understand anything from first principles because brains" lesswrong poster.

3 replies 0 reposts 9 likes


mynnna's avatar mynnna @mynnna.bsky.social
[ View ]

he really isnโ€™t using the AI to litigate, heโ€™s making up a case to hypothesize how an AI might HELP litigate, itโ€™s totally different! (Itโ€™s just a different version of making up a guy to get mad at is what it is, lmao)

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes