|
Rachel Shelden@rachelshelden.bsky.social |
lolsob
9 replies 8 reposts 139 likes
|
Haller Jackson
@haller.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"when properly applied" is doing so, so, so much work
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
doleful moo of a cow
@oulipien.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Judges are like umpires: it ain't nothing til they call it
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Southern Violet
@southernviolet.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I mean the SCOTUS is a lot like the umpires at the moment. They call it just as wrong just as often, after all.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Potomatic
@onbluskysku.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Going back to the 1L originalism seminar to beg judges to stop reading what you actually wrote the last time
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
b-boy bouiebaisse
@jbouie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
my main thought reading this is whether kavanaugh has ever had an original thought
30 replies 7 reposts 304 likes
|
shambibble
@shambibble.com
[ View ] |
this is the most ill-judged attempt at defining a "big 3" since j.cole
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Benjamin Park
@benjaminepark.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That’s a lot of Scalia.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Christian Mott
@cjmott.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The umpire analogy, while generally inapt, is actually somewhat appropriate in Rahimi -- baseball umpires also change their calls in response to excessive criticism.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
1 replies 1 reposts 2 likes
|
Brent Snavely
@brentasnavely.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think I just read that, "Judges are like Bork and Scalia..."
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes