Radley Balko's avatar

Radley Balko

@radleybalko.bsky.social

Looks like they’re going to try.

www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/n...

4 replies 23 reposts 86 likes


The American Civil War Podcast's avatar The American Civil War Podcast @uscivilwar.bsky.social
[ View ]

Recognizing that the SCOTUS decision is extremely unpopular among politically-aware American on the Left or anywhere near it: I am still mulling over whether they feasibly could have ruled in any other way without inviting bizarre legal consequences. It would require splitting extremely fine hairs.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


crossery's avatar crossery @cdg864.bsky.social
[ View ]

The best part is we can speculate as though John "Taney2" Roberts actually has a legal theory underpinning his calvinball. It's all word vomit to reach the conclusion he wants. Very bizarre to think the president can kill or jail his opponent but cannot regulate power plants.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Sharmake Farah 's avatar Sharmake Farah @sharmake.bsky.social
[ View ]

Part of the reason they can even do it is because it relied on evidence of stuff that happened while he was in president, which is presumably official acts and thus can't be used as evidence.

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Jung Choi "I dissent!"'s avatar Jung Choi "I dissent!" @jung-gt.bsky.social
[ View ]

Um, didn't these actions (hush money payments) take place before he took office?

1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes