|
NonServiam@satanarchist.bsky.social |
So, increasing the numbers of one species necessitates the permanent captivity of other animals? That's an incredibly stupid take.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Humphrey Bogart's Hairpiece
@onychomys.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They're repositories of biodiversity. I'm not at all sure how we could do that without having the animals in captivity. And it's not just one species. Wiki lists a bunch, and there are certainly others that are probably extinct in the wild or very close to it.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
2 replies 0 reposts 2 likes