Serti πŸŒŽβ€οΈπŸ•ŠοΈπŸŒŠπŸ™πŸΌ+πŸ§¬πŸ’‰πŸŒˆally's avatar

Serti πŸŒŽβ€οΈπŸ•ŠοΈπŸŒŠπŸ™πŸΌ+πŸ§¬πŸ’‰πŸŒˆally

@serti.bsky.social

I blame the Founding Fathers, who apparently never considered either the possibility of a presidential candidate or judges lacking honor and some sort of positive morality, or the people being nitwit enough to elect such a person.

3 replies 1 reposts 9 likes


Franklin D. Roosefella's avatar Franklin D. Roosefella @roosefella.bsky.social
[ View ]

the considered a president lacking honor. just not everyone else going along with it to own the libs.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Gutt Levy's avatar Gutt Levy @stomachtax.bsky.social
[ View ]

There is literally no legal document you can write that completely protects a country from a big enough headcount of zealots looking to upend it

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Peter Sagal's avatar Peter Sagal @petersagal.bsky.social
[ View ]

They did, actually. The very separation of powers that the 6 justices used as an excuse to place the President above the law was meant to be a safeguard against any one branch acting badly.

3 replies 6 reposts 23 likes