|
Seth Masket@smotus.bsky.social |
Seems like “No we will not delay this because Trump was convicted for actions prior to his presidency” would have been a reasonable response.
8 replies 25 reposts 109 likes
|
Seth Masket@smotus.bsky.social |
Seems like “No we will not delay this because Trump was convicted for actions prior to his presidency” would have been a reasonable response.
8 replies 25 reposts 109 likes
|
BearPondBoy🍦
@bearpondboy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
WTAF
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Scott Monje
@scottmonje.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He was president when the records were falsified.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Very Very Common Mike Dunford
@questauthority.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Deal with it now. Makes for simpler appeals process.
1 replies 0 reposts 15 likes
|
Patricia
@theshrk22.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I hardly think one of these felonies constitutes an “official” act as President.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Connor Lynch
@connorlynch.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That isn’t correct; every single check and false record was cut or created after Inauguration Day and prosecutors used evidence to convict him, which SCOTUS says is presumptively not allowed. Cleanest disposal is waiver because he didn’t raise it in time.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Jeremy Bailin
@astrobailin.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The payments to Cohen were made while he was president, though? So the actual crimes happened while he was president. But even this court couldn't possibly call those official acts.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Professor Furious
@professorfurious.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Agreed. Does every SCOTUS ruling just break every judge's brain?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Evan Hess
@ehess.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The problem is that the prosecution introduced evidence dating from after the beginning of Trump's presidency that may be inadmissible now according to the SC decision
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes