|
Asawin Suebsaeng@swin24.bsky.social |
Years before this ruling, that was the defense trotted out by the Calm Down types: they didn’t do it! Too many people said no, I won’t commit crimes for you, Trump. They fail to realize there were multiple who were willing! If he’s reelected how many Jeff Clark’s do you wanna risk him appointing
8 replies 50 reposts 341 likes
|
Stef @wikisteff@mastodon.social Christensen
@wikisteff.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I worry about Roger Stone wielding "the President is immune, just have him do it."
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Infamous Unknown
@infamousunknown.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And honestly, I don't think he thought he would win the first time. Neither, he, or his people, had any idea how things worked. They brought in halfway normal people. Yea, a Oil Exec for energy wasn't ideal, but he wasn't a sycophant. This time would (not will) be different.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
@surfingthepast.bsky.social
[ View ] |
When I was young and naïve I fought to remove what I thought were terrible administrators. I quickly learned that you might win a battle but if the powers that be liked what that administrator was doing they'd find someone the same to replace him. There's always someone willing to sell their soul.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Asawin Suebsaeng
@swin24.bsky.social
[ View ] |
IMBECILE
0 replies 0 reposts 14 likes
|
'viktor shtrum'
@viktorshtrum.bsky.social
[ View ] |
people have committed mass shootings for Trump
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Mark Shatraw
@markshatraw.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Between Stephen Miller's own personal Stasi cosplay department and the NYC FBI field office who spent all of 2016 leaking to Giuliani, does anybody really *doubt* that there are feds out there who will do their fuhrer's bidding?
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
eric
@ericgerhardt.com
[ View ] |
I mean part of Project 2025 is basically, we're going to fire everybody in the government who *isn't* a Trumpist and replace them with people who are. Expecting anyone in the chain of command to save us with their principled stand is dangerously naive.
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Matt Casey
@mattcasey.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I'm sure that "POTUS is unencumbered by the law but the entire executive branch working for him is" is a "problem" that the supreme court would be happy to solve if asked
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes