|
Tica the Sloth@ticasloth.bsky.social |
How are you defining "understand"?
5 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Taka Hanazawa
@takahanazawa.bsky.social
[ View ] |
How are YOU
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Lev Mirov
@thelionmachine.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If we narrow "understanding" to a very metrics driven "can consistently output useful, correct, and relevant answers to prompts related to red as a color which display *conceptual knowledge* about what red or color is" ChatGPT does not understand and cannot learn these things.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Kingfisher & Wombat
@tkingfisher.com
[ View ] |
Here is an example. The program obviously did not understand what starting and ending with the same letter means. It just generated statistically likely words in sequence.
bsky.app/profile/kath...
3 replies 2 reposts 58 likes
|
Kathryn Tewson
@kathryntewson.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It does not hold an internal model of what it is saying; it does not have evaluative or analytical capacity. It simply arranges text in patterns statistically similar to those in its training corpus.
1 replies 0 reposts 15 likes
|
An Adorable Sergal
@adorable-sergal-things.neocities.org
[ View ] |
As someone who has some skin in the game on this, "intelligence" in this context *used* to mean using non-traditional programming methods to solve tasks that previously were only completed by humans. Artificial Neural Networks were one way to do this. It wasn't magical. There's no "spirit"...
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes