Saw a post describing a song as "dated", which is a totally fair comment (especially on said song!), but I think a big part of my outlook on music is that "dated" often means joyfully and powerfully speaking to its moment, and this can be as or more valuable than the "timeless"
Getting into that whole Dap-Tone soul revival wave did a lot to sort of recalibrate my ideas about that -- it is clearly identifiable as the aesthetic of a certain era, and yet why does that aesthetic persist where other contemporaneous ones recede?
When people describe something as "dated" I always suspect they mean: "comes from an era I do not currently think is cool." In any case, I tend to think the best music achieves timelessness while still being quintessentially of its time and place. But then, I'm an old man who likes The Beatles.
Well...
It still fills floors now. One measure of timelessness.
It already includes 60s Herbie Hancock, Bootsy Collins and (bang up to date) Q-Tip.
In the same year, 7 songs that were covers, old or used oldies got to no.1. Including the one that blocked GIITH.
It's an incredible record.
Wouldn’t you say evocative or similar if you were being nice though, dated to me says old and rubbish (though I’d probably say old and rubbish rather than dated)