|
K. Chen@tznkai.bsky.social |
A few people have pointed out the incoherence of overturning Chevron and giving the executive absolute immunity and it may really be as simple as encouraging the Presidency as personalist rule.
4 replies 7 reposts 34 likes
|
Alex 🏳️🌈
@alexanotherone.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Chevron + Schedule F fucks with the civil service a lot and will be very difficult to unwind, which is pretty much the point They're doing what they want to do, deprofessionalize a branch of government which will tell them no That's all this is about
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
|
K. Chen
@tznkai.bsky.social
[ View ] |
In a sense this goes a way towards explaining why conservatives who should surely know better than to support Trump, a man with no virtues, conservative or otherwise, keep supporting Trump. He's not the sort of man they want ruling, but he is the sort of *ruler* they want.
1 replies 2 reposts 15 likes
|
Noel French
@noelfrench.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think, too, if you look at the cases in the context of judicial supremacy, they're very coherent in that both purport to rest the final decision with the courts and SCOTUS in particular. It's just that the obvious consequence of the latter is that SCOTUS is expandable...?
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Tarn O
@tarnado.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Bonapartism.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes