|
Richard Waite@waiterich.bsky.social |
Solar can produce 100x the useable energy per hectare (or acre) vs bioenergy across the vast majority of the world’s land. 🧪 🔌 💡 www.sustainablefoodfuture.org
2 replies 25 reposts 107 likes
|
Richard Waite@waiterich.bsky.social |
Solar can produce 100x the useable energy per hectare (or acre) vs bioenergy across the vast majority of the world’s land. 🧪 🔌 💡 www.sustainablefoodfuture.org
2 replies 25 reposts 107 likes
|
Shulamit
@shulamit.bsky.social
[ View ] |
People have thought of this--and it doesn't work.
1. Plants are the most efficient, cost-effective "solar cells" in existence.
2. Unfortunately, there are more brownfields (dead fields) than could ever be covered with solar, so no reason to use arable land for solar.
www.epa.gov/re-powering
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@oemera.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Is there a simple way to calculate how much nitrogen in the soil would be reduced by using solar energy instead of biomass as a fuel?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes