|
Rachel@weener.bsky.social |
I don’t think that’s the case. The decision basically just overturns Martin v Boise and means that each state’s law is the basis for how homeless encampments are regulated. What was so great about Martin was that it meant cities in the 9th Circuit could only sweep camps if there were shelter beds/
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Rachel
@weener.bsky.social
[ View ] |
that were open/available for those folks. The 9th Circuit had said it was cruel and unusual punishment to criminalize sleeping outdoors when the people essentially had no choice. This Grants Pass decision means those cities can once again criminalize homelessness even if there are no shelter beds.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes