|
AkivaMCohen@akivamcohen.bsky.social |
If the Washington Post headline tomorrow isn't "SCOTUS Rules POTUS Can Assassinate SCOTUS Without Criminal Liability" I don't know what we're even doing
6 replies 47 reposts 217 likes
|
Tree Mendous
@treemendous.bsky.social
[ View ] |
*Insert face eating tiger meme here*
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@rewenzo.bsky.social
[ View ] |
how does the evidentiary bar on official acts shake out in the classified docs case. trump's decision to send the docs to his house and his decision to declassify (or not) were official acts. can trump use evidence of these acts as a defense? can the government use evidence of these facts to rebut?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Pyrito Hedron
@pyritohedron.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Are any commentators offering a refutation of the "President orders assassination of opponents, pardons the assassin" hypothetical after this ruling, or are they just shrugging and saying it won't happen? Does each assassination have to be adjudicated to determine whether it's an official act?
2 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Innocent🕷Abroad
@jjgass.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"although he may face consequences if the other party holds the House and roughly 35% of his party's senators agree to impeach him. "Note that there have been four impeachments in US history, and in none of them have more than one (?) senator from POTUS's party voted to convict."
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Father John Chungus
@sorocchungus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We both know the headline is gonna about Biden being old lmaooo
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
'Swas
@sbeen.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"POTUS to SCOTUS: Drop Dead"
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes