Amy Westervelt's avatar

Amy Westervelt

@amywestervelt.bsky.social

Just when you think the NYT's coverage of Gaza (for which they have won a Pulitzer, absolutely destroying any last shred of respect I have for this industry), they print this, the morning we've all woken up to beheaded children and refugees burned alive.

9 replies 129 reposts 293 likes


Paul Rosenberg's avatar Paul Rosenberg @paulrosenberg.bsky.social
[ View ]

"Never Again!" => "Never? Again!"

0 replies 1 reposts 7 likes


Noodles's avatar Noodles @ognoodlecup.bsky.social
[ View ]

"stop accusing us of genocide!" They say as they go on to clarify that even if a genocide was happening it would be ok because self defense.

0 replies 0 reposts 21 likes


Elrond Hubbard's avatar Elrond Hubbard @danmitchell.bsky.social
[ View ]

"absolved of responsibility"

0 replies 0 reposts 12 likes


Robert David Sullivan's avatar Robert David Sullivan @robertdsullivan.bsky.social
[ View ]

Above quote is from an opinion column in the NYT by James Kirchick. www.nytimes.com/2024/05/27/o...

2 replies 1 reposts 13 likes


's avatar @boyishman.bsky.social
[ View ]

"instigated a war"

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Wrecked's avatar Wrecked @jmk2445683.bsky.social
[ View ]

The New York Times offered the world puff pieces on Hitler and apologia for the unfolding holocaust in WW2. They are who they always have been.

0 replies 1 reposts 7 likes


proleartthreat's avatar proleartthreat @proleartthreat.bsky.social
[ View ]

they are (half) right....this is a west creation....Israel and the US are now alarmed and surprised like any enabled man syddenly called out for their abuses

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


๐Ÿฅˆ72 dogs ๐Ÿ's avatar ๐Ÿฅˆ72 dogs ๐Ÿ @careycuprisin.bsky.social
[ View ]

James Kirchick has always been a smooth-brained hack

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Lurk du Soleil's avatar Lurk du Soleil @lurkdusoleil.bsky.social
[ View ]

The articleโ€™s thesis is entirely predicated on a post from a Twitter account with 360 followers. It was journalistic malpractice for the oped editors to have selected it on that basis alone. But they also let it run with this absurd statement trying to reframe a legal question. Shame on them.

0 replies 1 reposts 5 likes