|
Ari Cohn@aricohn.com |
Upshot: SCOTUS vacates and remands the NetChoice cases because of the facial challenge irregularity that came up at oral arguments, but the Court takes the time to explain how it views the First Amendment principles at issue, with a not-at-all-disguised swipe at the 5th Circuit.
6 replies 29 reposts 144 likes
|
PsTeq1993
@psteq1993.bsky.social
[ View ] |
5th cir.
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Justin Wallace
@justingwallace.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Dear Diary, Today I learned that even this Supreme Court has limits. Weird day. Love, Justin
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
George W Harris
@bullcityfats.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Courtspeak for "The fuck is wrong with you?"
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Ari Cohn
@aricohn.com
[ View ] |
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
1 replies 2 reposts 16 likes
|
Joé McKen
@joemcken.net
[ View ] |
SCOTUS may have just declared the US president is a god-king to whom the Constitution does not apply, but at least they didn’t also tear down the free and open Internet with it. So … mixed blessings?
1 replies 1 reposts 3 likes
|
|
@gpthacker.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Who fucking cares, Trump2 initiates nationwide censorship of all media, with Cris Rufo in charge.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes