Watching the British election returns I feel compelled to point out that the 650 person House of Commons represents 67 million people and the 435 person House of Representatives in the United States represents 333 million.
Replace the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929. We deserve representation.
The only time George Washington offered an opinion during the Constitutional Convention was to urge a lower number for apportionment - one representative per 30,000, because one per 40,000 was unacceptable.
One seat should represent whatever number represents the smallest state population. That would be Wyoming iirc, so each representative should represent like 580k people.
If we followed the so-called "Cube Root Rule," we would have around 690 members of the House of Representatives. I don't think that's too many. We already have one house of Congress where the small states are over-represented. It's stupid to have _both_ houses that way.
1 rep for every 500K people.
It ends up being 666 (sorry) reps with quick math, but with rounding it can be made to be less demonic and even numbered.
Go the UK route it would be over 3,300K reps.
I donβt see how that is tenable to get something done.
The only one of the original 12 amendments to the constitution that was not adopted required that each congressional district contain no more than 50,000 citizens. Today that would mean 6600 reps!
I'm sure we can find an in-between. Even the framers recognized that maybe there should be a limit.
I get your point and agree with it, but also I just did head math to see what our legislature would look like if we kept it proportional to the British numbers and whoa.
Also add 50 senators. You can keep the same 6 year terms, and stagger so every state is voting for a senator every 2 years.
Also make DC a state ffs and have PR vote for statehood.