Reposted by CaseyL
'You only have until June 26, 2024 to say no to Meta taking your personal photos and words and using them to train their generative AI. Here are step-by-step directions for opting out.'
Link: deborahcopaken.substack.com/p/11-steps-t...
#Privacy #Meta #Facebook
52 replies
429 reposts
457 likes
SCOTUS is already discredited. An immunity decision favoring Trump would salt the earth where their credibility used to be - which matters only if Trump loses the election.
If they rule in favor of Trump, they're saying they're confident the fix is in and he'll win in November.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
This is horrible news. They're going to crack down on the reporting, not support it.
This isn't even "doing the right thing after trying everything else," this is going to be straight-up censorship.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Does that mean you can watch games without guilt from now on?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It is possible to find and - very important! - financially support REAL news organizations.
The Guardian (which has a US edition)
ProPublica - breaker of many stories the MSM eventually carries
...and a host of regional/specialty news orgs, like Texas Observer.
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
SCOTUS: Proud sponsor of American carnage.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Or is that your preferred outcome as well?
Articles of Confederation?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
But Chevron limits the damage they can do. Or would, if batshit crazy wasn't in control.
To be sure, the GOP and its SCOTUS could pretty much dismantle the government entirely, since its animating principle, insofar as it has any principles, seems to be the Articles of Confederation.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
And what Congress has given, Congress can take away.
And a GOP Congress would love to gut all of it.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
OK, so that's a terrific recipe for plane crashes and epidemics.
(Not to mention all the other real-world disasters of relying on Congress to regulate everything. AgriBiz will love getting rid of food safety labeling.
But, hey, never let practicality get in the way of your ideology!
1 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
Let's take a look, shall we?
The FAA: who is more likely to know most about aviation? A judge? Or an "unelected bureaucrat" - who happened to spend their previous career in aviation?
Or the CDC. Again, who do you want setting health policy and approving medications? Judges or epidemiologists?
1 replies
1 reposts
8 likes
WTAF? What is this, a dating site profile?
"Small independent school" = a rich crank's privately-funded indoctrination center. Probably religious and/or military in nature.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
YouTube ads hawking "tactical" vests, wallets, raincoats, pants, etc.
Going for young male militia wanna-bes...
..who aren't supposed to notice that "tactical" = "pockets."
But I notice, and I think it's hilarious.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Didn't realize there were that many vacancies.
It is long past time to ignore the blue slips.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
SCOTUS ignores standing when it wants to. This time it didn't want to.
"People are saying" - that Big Pharma's argument about the impact this would have on the drug industry persuaded the RW contingent on SCOTUS.
That sounds right to me.
1 replies
2 reposts
12 likes
For "conscience," substitute "vanity."
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I have always bought used phones and computers. And I hang onto them until they just about literally fall apart. Because I'm cheap (and completely uninterested in the latest bells-&-whistles.)
Now feel like a prophet in my own time.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
How many CEOs of Big Tech are themselves actual techies as opposed to tech bros?
Most of them aren't. It's easy to BS them, bc they don't have the chops to know they're being BS'd.
What you have is a circle jerk of $$$ who believe their own PR, chasing one another's approval.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes