|
Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social |
First is Corner Post. Barrett has the court's 6-3 ideological decision holding that APA claims accrue from plaintiff's injury, not the date of the final rule — opening up all rules to possible new challenges. Jackson writes the dissent for the liberals. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
4 replies 24 reposts 56 likes
|
Cynbel Terreus
@cynbelterreus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Literally a company could be set up to SPECIFICALLY be injured by some fucking rule made decades ago and they would have 6 years to then bring challenge, this is the dumbest fucking shit
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
|
Cynbel Terreus
@cynbelterreus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
an infinite number of years from now a new company can challenge a rule made decades ago YAY so great and awesome and very logical /s
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
@jackiegardina.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's ridiculous that we receive SCOTUS decisions like this in 2024 Livestream the decisions!
1 replies 1 reposts 8 likes
|
|
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Jackson urges Congress to "address this absurdity and forestall the coming chaos" in dissent.
4 replies 27 reposts 129 likes