|
Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social |
Roberts has the opinion for the court. Thomas concurs. Barrett concurs in part. Sotomayor dissents for the Democratic appointees. Jackson also writes her own dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
3 replies 13 reposts 77 likes
|
Herko
@herko.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You know it’s a bad decision if Thomas concurs. That said, I’m not sure this would’ve gone any other way, and it’s not the unqualified win for Trump that some are already painting it as.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
PJ.bsky.social
@peacehopeubuntu.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Excuse me, sorry to bother you, but I am totally Confused...what Acts can he be Held Responsible for? Is it being kicked back down to lower courts to decide? Thank you for your time
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
|
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
[ View ] |
As to Trump: - Absolutely immune from prosecution for DOJ discussions. - Presumption of immunity for efforts to pressure Pence, but could be rebutted on remand. - Discussions w state actors and Jan. 6 comments must be determined if they are official or not on remand.
7 replies 38 reposts 120 likes