Checking on prominent originalists on the other site, I can't find one who has criticized yesterday's anti-textualist immunity opinion. All have tweeted on other topics. Here are the reactions:
Mocks dissent: Barnett
Silence: Baude, Green, McGinnis, Rappaport, Sachs, Whittington
Randy Barnett has ceased to be an originalist in any meaningful sense. Any principles expressed in his academic writing are fully abandoned IRL in favor of lib-owning.
Of course, a law professor doesn't have an obligation to comment on every SCOTUS opinion. But, there seems to be a pattern emerging. Notably, our resident orignalist at Bluesky, @evanbernick.bsky.social, condemned the immunity opinion. bsky.app/profile/evan...
Call me a cynic, but I’ve seen very, very few self-styled Constitutional “originalists” who are anything more than garden-variety conservative hacks whose purported legal & historical philosophy is a smokescreen to try and hide their naked partisanship.
I won't fault the silent ones for not having a hot take, but I would expect something at some point soon.
Barnett... argh. He was a prof at my law school when I arrived, if I'd been a year earlier or so I might have taken a class with him. But irony: he represented my former doctor in Raich...