|
Faine Greenwood@faineg.bsky.social |
Oh, it COULD be done. It would be utterly horrific on a scale that boggles the mind, but yeah, it could be done.
5 replies 0 reposts 25 likes
|
Faine Greenwood@faineg.bsky.social |
Oh, it COULD be done. It would be utterly horrific on a scale that boggles the mind, but yeah, it could be done.
5 replies 0 reposts 25 likes
|
Christopher Bird
@mightygodking.com
[ View ] |
But to no meaningful end, because one side of the conflict simply wants things that are true to not untrue and policies that cannot work to succeed, so when they fail - which will be quickly - they'll do the only thing they can do, which is blame the other side somehow and start a war anyway
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Faine Greenwood
@faineg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
India got partitioned at the cost of just a few million lives after all
1 replies 0 reposts 32 likes
|
Ken Yee
@yuweiquan.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I’m an American partially because of China’s civil war, which as everyone knows, went swimmingly
1 replies 3 reposts 37 likes
|
Elly
@ellyzoe.bsky.social
[ View ] |
“Red” areas would never “let” it happen bc “blue” areas are where all the money and waterways and trade and etc are.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Peter Ravn Rasmussen
@peterravn.bsky.social
[ View ] |
There is historical precedent for how horrific it would be: the Partition of India.
2 replies 0 reposts 9 likes