|
The Fig Economy@figgityfigs.bsky.social |
Like a lot of this stuff is the hypotheticals and logical implications of the decision, and they’re important to understand its scope and radicalism, but *right in the decision” they say the president talking to the vice president about overthrowing the election is immune.
3 replies 1 reposts 12 likes
|
Malraux
@malraux.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I mean, there are some clear limitations in the decision. For example, democratic presidents won’t have the presumption of immunity.
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Cloud's Strife
@jmgreene28.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's kind of amazing how short people's memories are: www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tru...
1 replies 1 reposts 3 likes
|
|
The Fig Economy
@figgityfigs.bsky.social
[ View ] |
*Right in the decision* they say the president directing DoJ officials on prosecutions is immune. Official acts include having conversations about how to use the powers of your office to do crime.
0 replies 0 reposts 9 likes