|
Frank Hightower 🐁@frankhghtwr.bsky.social |
What's really scary to me is the way this is worded. Procedural games are generative AI (or at least what we called generative AI pre-pandemic) and are, for the most part, well loved; yet there is no ambiguity in this headline as to what they're referring to. I hate this timeline so much
3 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Jake Staines
@sanakism.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I mean, I guess procedural games are AI in the same way that as ChatGPT and MidJourney are AI - that is, Not Actually Artificial Intelligence. But the point of modern "AI" LLMs etc. is to use a generalised approach to producing its random gibberish, while a good procedural algorithm did neither.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
LoneWolf
@lonelylupine.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What I hate how people will come up with "this thing is generative AI" based on the thinnest justification. People are literally calling spell-checkers AI. My toaster must be AI because it trains on sliced bread to generate toast.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Oregon the DM🕎
@oregonthedm.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I can't think of a single Nintendo game that used that. Most of those are 3rd party things like no man's sky or some indi game. I don't get why this would stress you, Nintendo said they won't do it not others couldn't sell it.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes