|
Gautham FC@gauthamrao.bsky.social |
Before SCOTUS' ruling, here's our historian's brief which argues there is no basis in founding era history for the idea that presidents should enjoy immunity. In fact, the founders believed that presidents should be accountable under the rule of law. www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
2 replies 41 reposts 75 likes
|
Lee Rowan
@leerowan.bsky.social
[ View ] |
There would be no IMPEACHMENT PROCESS if immunity were any part of the office of President.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Mark Stout
@markstout.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think it's amusing that this Brennan Center brief on Presidential claims of immunity notes three times--if I counted correctly--that the founders said that the President could even be subjected to capital punishment.
1 replies 4 reposts 14 likes