|
T. Greg Doucette@gregdoucette.bsky.social |
No, my take was that cops should be required to carry individual malpractice insurance – pay settlements from that, watch rates rise based on risk, and price bad cops out of the profession
7 replies 6 reposts 84 likes
|
August
@augustbenassi.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thank you for the reply. Also an idea I think would be excellent to implement.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
NTP_Nate 2.0
@ntpnate.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But if we did that cops might be afraid to act at all. What if there was an active shooter situation at an elementary school, for exam… oh.
0 replies 4 reposts 33 likes
|
Infamous Unknown
@infamousunknown.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is along the lines of requiring insurance for gun ownership. It prices certain guns / people combinations out of the market. No one is selling insurance for a 10 year old to own an AR. And safety solutions can be priced in to drive costs down. Could even be part of the same law.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Fnord Borgly
@borgly.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They can save money with the union's group plan, hopefully leading to "dammit Frank, leave that kid alone, if there's another premium hike I can't take the family to Branson this year."
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Breakfast Dans
@thegreatets.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Is that how medial malpractice insurance works?
2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Miracle Whippets
@crestwood.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Me: Qualified Immunity is bullshit. Cop Friend: Without it, I couldn’t do my job. Me:
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
The Cheese Goddess
@thecheesegoddess.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s a brilliant idea to be fair.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes