|
b-boy bouiebaisse@jbouie.bsky.social |
once again i think that mark lemley’s article on the “imperial supreme court” is the most perceptive thing written about the roberts court and its overarching project harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-13...
8 replies 168 reposts 482 likes
|
Faine Greenwood
@faineg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
oh, absolutely, thanks for reminding me of this
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Mitchell Epner
@mitchellepner.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Prof. Lemley has been an intellectual superstar for decades. I'm proud to call him a friend. @marklemley.bsky.social
0 replies 0 reposts 11 likes
|
@jiminnh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thank you for sharing this.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Wendell Albright
@wendella.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Deferring to the Supreme Court is a norm. How long do we observe a norm in the face of an utterly unleashed and unimpeded Court that does the fuck what it wants and makes up reasons for it later?
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Sandy Parker
@sandyparker.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The "newfound conservative majority is simply doing whatever it wants in the cases before it, consistent with a particularly strong form of the legal realist idea that judges just implement their own policy preferences."
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
|
Sandy Parker
@sandyparker.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"The common denominator across multiple opinions in the last two years is that they concentrate power in one place: the Supreme Court." 🔥🔥🔥
1 replies 3 reposts 31 likes
|
Omar Lizardo
@olizardo.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The motivated reasoning supreme court
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Patrick Schmidt
@pdwschmidt.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yes, but I have been thinking about how right Thomas Keck was back in *2004*.
press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/bo...
1 replies 2 reposts 8 likes