|
b-boy bouiebaisse@jbouie.bsky.social |
it is relevant inasmuch that even a prosecution of the interrogator may want to bring evidence of illegal intent from the white house
3 replies 3 reposts 91 likes
|
b-boy bouiebaisse@jbouie.bsky.social |
it is relevant inasmuch that even a prosecution of the interrogator may want to bring evidence of illegal intent from the white house
3 replies 3 reposts 91 likes
|
Jack Frazee
@jack-frazee.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The president can pardon people prior to them being indicted, so they wouldn’t even have to go through trial.
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Chris
@lurkdusoleil.bsky.social
[ View ] |
There is also every reason to think that this court will expand Trump v. U.S in his second term to extend immunity to those doing his bidding. I.e., “Our holding in Trump v. U.S. demands that government officials be able to enact the will of the executive without fear of criminal proceedings.”
12 replies 72 reposts 348 likes
|
JiSe
@jise.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And especially when commanding the police to do it inside the US, the Qualified Immunity would probably shield them for most troubles.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes