|
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis@jeffjarvis.bsky.social |
It's naive and simplistic, I think, to say that The New York Times is for Trump. They favor chaos, for they think they are the solution to chaos when, of course, they are an agent of it. The Times shares Murdoch's worldview not in ideology but in the business model: sensationalism of its own sort.
4 replies 6 reposts 25 likes
|
Paul Allopenna
@paulallopenna.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They do favor chaos, I agree. I think the two most obvious reasons are that it generates revenue, and they don’t really believe that a second DJT administration will do what it threatens to do.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Cathy Gellis
@cathygellis.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I thought we had the Post and Newsday for that. The Times was supposed to be above the tabloid fray.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Michael Kaplan
@differance.bsky.social
[ View ] |
but her emails!
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Sactown Tim
@sactowntim.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I don't know Jeff, isn't that a really short jump? Trump's whole brand is sensationalism and chaos. I think most of these media outlets know that a Trump loss puts that gravy train in serious jeopardy. He'll still be around, but incredibly diminished.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes