|
Joe Katz@joekatz45.bsky.social |
Here's a good explainer on why this is really, really bad if you like the federal government to be able to... you know. Regulate.
7 replies 170 reposts 314 likes
|
Jinesh Gheeya, MD, PhD
@jinesh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They don’t want to regulate. They believe in free market. So if a billionaire has enough money, he will buy the right policy.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Kobalt Network
@kobaltfox.bsky.social
[ View ] |
it's just one of those rulings where you know they were paid off.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Michael Love
@elkmovie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Shorter version: everything is Boeing now
0 replies 2 reposts 9 likes
|
|
Joe Katz
@joekatz45.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Also this video from @angryblacklady.bsky.social.
Terrible for the environment, workers, food and drug safety, you name it.
Great if you want these Supreme Court justices to have a veto on whatever the executive does.
1 replies 5 reposts 13 likes
|
Matt - Why We Seek
@whyweseek.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Not like a lot were happening as it is, but yeah this will help to kill what little regulations were taking place
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@mreugenides.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Small Pennsylvania town: You owe us millions in mitigation costs for turning our water supply into poison. Big chem company: So, sue me.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Vested
@vestedgames.com
[ View ] |
Honestly, I might trade Roe v. Wade for Chevron deference, but a reactionary conservative activist Court usually precedes a tremendous progressive social shift. So I guess we should all roll up our sleeves for the muckraking to come.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes