|
Just Call Me Frank@justcallmefrank.bsky.social |
So, if the SCOTUS "Constitutional Originalists" think the President has criminal immunity against everything, why do they think the Constitution of the United States has a process for impeaching a President that includes when he commits crimes.
3 replies 6 reposts 13 likes
|
Ghost Bear ☮
@ghostbear077.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Strictly speaking, that is now the only time that the President CAN be convicted of a crime. Once he's out, he's immune.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Alfred N Montestruc
@anmontestruc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The system is going off the rails and civil war is going to be sooner than later. Not advocating it at all, sadly predicting it. If u have studied Roman history we are still well before Caesar. But the Romans had several civil wars before Caesar.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
Alfred N Montestruc
@anmontestruc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Immunity from standard prosecution by a regular prosecutor. Not from impeachment by the house & conviction by the senate. The problem I see is founders did not contemplate political parties. The refusal of the Democrats in the senate to have the trial for Mayorkas is a poster child for that.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes