Perfect Times lead. Open with a reactionary exulting over an abstract principle that will hurt other people (and would have with a minor change of circumstance hurt her). Then cut to the real person suffering real harm as if they are equivalent.
Look I don’t know her exact circumstances but if she went through IVF twice, seems unlikely she only ever created two embryos.
Wonder what happened to the other ones
I loved the one about a "divisive America" causing families to move to new states and one was like "joe brandon made me wear a mask once" and the other was "our trans child was almost bullied to death"
I'm curious about where Brumfield got IVF and what happened to any embryos left over after her 2 children were born. As to whether the Times even mentions up those 2 details
The View From Nowhere just can't help giving the fascist top billing, then spilling a gallon of ink trying to rationalize a purely ideological crusade.
I think the journalist would say that the placement is meant to let the reader compare the situations and come to their own conclusion. Again though, no follow-up on Blumfield, an activist who would no longer be able to use the treatment because of something something Jesus embryos
Someone needs to explain to me why people “as Christians” begins at embryonic stage. I read the Bible and Christ never talked about that. Not even a little bit.
The whole "you don't have a right for your own medical freedom/treatments" to also "banning fluoride in public water for a county because of medical freedom" 😵💫
Also she is so bad at thinking that she doesn't realize this law will force IVF clinics like the ones she went to to close their doors. Conservatives just do not consider consequences because Jesus
This has been burned into my brain: "My grandfather had this old line: 'When you buy the New York Times, you’re not buying news; you’re buying judgement.' That judgement is a really important part of our promise."