|
Kieran Healy@kjhealy.bsky.social |
lol Academia is totally going to eat all its seed corn on why-not-eat-the-seed-corn grounds like “Oh come on I’m busy and it’s more efficient” or “No-one really reads stuff anyway” arxiv.org/abs/2403.07183
23 replies 110 reposts 377 likes
|
William Clare Roberts 🇵🇸
@marxinhell.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We are so screwed.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
jadehawk
@jadehawk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
this is clearly the fault of feminism for taking away Wives(tm) from academics who now have to actually write their own papers instead of just handing their lab notes to their spouse whose job this clearly was
0 replies 0 reposts 26 likes
|
Katie Tightpussy
@juicysteak117.gay
[ View ] |
fucking unreal
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Wendell B
@wndlb.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Well, words, exhaled, ARE CO2, and this follows the hockey puck
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
@aradfirer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
On some level it's only fair that AI should review papers, now that papers written by AI get submitted and published. I mean, it's called *peer* review.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Seth Masket
@smotus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is a commendable and meticulous finding.
0 replies 0 reposts 12 likes
|
freakanatcha.bsky.social
@freakanatcha.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"Commendible", "meticulus", "intracate" and "versatal" all fell within the top decile of increase in probability of occurring in a sentence
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Dunkin' Idahos
@wendlle.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Academia created a system where it's very impossible to do everything asked of you, and now it's all ShockedPikachuFace.png when LLM-generated papers are laying that bare for all to see.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Joe Dunman
@joedunman.bsky.social
[ View ] |
FFS
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Drew Baird
@drewbaird.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Why even agree to do a review if you’re gonna wait until the last minute and scramble to Chat GPT?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Tommy Löfstedt
@tommylofstedt.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Insert the we’re totally fine gif.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Alex Merz
@merz.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Wait, I used "meticulous" in a paper just out, describing someone else's work. Does that mean... oh, no.
1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
James D'Emilio
@demiliopics2.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But what were the top adjectives for "Reviewer no. 2"?
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
@azaffle.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Have you looked at their governing council?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Peter Flynn
@docum3nt.bsky.social
[ View ] |
First question that comes to mind (not having read the paper yet) is "did they accidentally use AI-generated text in their study?"
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Gavia Gray
@reflected.codes
[ View ] |
I've tried getting Claude (opus) to help review arxiv papers and it is good at explaining notational differences or connecting ideas. I have not used it for conference papers.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@danjbain.bsky.social
[ View ] |
is going to?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Gerardo Martí
@gerardomarti.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thx for this commendable and innovative research, featuring innovative and meticulous graphs, with notable and versatile potential for application.
1 replies 0 reposts 24 likes
|
electrodave
@terencetrentdavey.bsky.social
[ View ] |
shut up
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Jimmy Yunge
@jimmy-yunge.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Reminds me of a certain rat article.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Joachim Vandekerckhove 🏖️
@joachim.cidlab.com
[ View ] |
Have you considered that recent submissions might be more meticulous and commendable owing to AI writing aids
1 replies 0 reposts 13 likes
|
OneDishwasher
@onedishwasher.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"Certainly! Here is your literature review"
0 replies 0 reposts 14 likes
|
Michiel Duvekot
@duvekot.bsky.social
[ View ] |
These AIs seem to operate on the principle that more adjectives makes for better writing.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes