Project 2025 is the GOP party platform they've been too afraid to write down since 2020. It is a collection of all their policy positions and plans for remaking America into the upside down, mirror universe version of itself.
That's why they don't want you to read it.
1 replies
11 reposts
32 likes
Sorry, dammit. I can't edit it, but it was a link to NYT coverage of Biden saying that he's not dropping out, no matter what.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
And no more "when they go low we go high" bullshit.
We are currently standing in the last ditch. Time to fight dirty, because if we lose, we lose EVERYTHING.
(4/4 end)
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
No defending Biden, or any other Democrat. Defending is losing. Defending is letting the other side choose the battleground.
Attack, attack, attack, ATTACK Trump's record, his competence, his policies, and his character.
(3/4)
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
But that ship has sailed. And this is the last I'll say about it until after the election, except for this:
If this election is about Biden, WE LOSE.
So from now on, everything must be about Trump. EVERYTHING.
(2/4)
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http...
Well, that's it. The decision is made. There's no way Biden can back down from this.
I admit, I think Biden is the wrong man for this fight. I thought he was the wrong man in 2020 specifically because I believed he'd lose a rematch.
(1/4)
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Kris Overstreet
You absolutely want those stories running in the NYT and WashPo and on CNN. All three have brand name credibility with Democratic voters who don't realize that they've been suborned by the interests of their billionaire owners/publishers.
So they have to be "more in concern than in anger" pieces
0 replies
2 reposts
1 likes
As do I.
But for that judgment to happen, the people have to be able to HEAR something other than the lies. And right now we do not live in that society, not with every major news outlet and social media company owned by conservatives.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
You know what? You're right. The American people obviously can't be trusted to run anything.
So let's go ahead and go straight to the dictatorship, shall we?
Or better yet, call up Charles Windsor and ask if he'll take us back.
Or else we stop the misinformation, and preserve freedom.
3 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
In other words, you have no solution and no intention of finding one.
Thanks for letting me know.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I don't have to. It's coming here January 21.
What are you going to do about it?
And what will you do to prevent it from coming after that?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It makes more sense than, "We must give the fascists every possible tool to make it as easy as possible to kill us all."
And since that's as civil as I can make it, I'm going to stop responding now before this gets any worse.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I have thought this through. A lot. I used to be a free speech absolutist.
But from where I sit, what you're saying is, "If we don't let Trump win, Trump wins."
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Dirtiest fighter always wins.
And the Democrats still insist on not tearing their delicate silk gloves while the Republicans have discarded the baseball bat and are picking up the axe.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
They're not even bothering to hide it anymore.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The UK left barely got any more votes (as a percentage) than they did in 2019 when they were wiped out.
The Tories lost because Farage used Putin's money to split the conservative vote.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Kris Overstreet
Ah fuck. Everyone who told me Chevron being overturned wouldnβt matter can kindly have a seat now. I donβt really consider myself an expert in much but considering Iβve been working in health regs for the past almost 8 years, I knew this was 100% coming. I just didnβt think it would be so fast π
9 replies
104 reposts
238 likes
I would prefer to give it to juries, actually.
(And not to judges. I think SCOTUS just proved how unreliable that would be.)
But the fact is, if lies and truth are treated with the same respect, lies will always win. QED.
3 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Then you tell me- what IS the solution to a candidate winning office by blatant lies?
Because the system we've got now IS NOT WORKING.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The Ministry of Truth is what Trump already brings to the table- that is, making it IMPOSSIBLE to tell truth from lies, and thus impossible to sustain or defend a democracy.
That's where protecting lies gets us.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yes, I know.
Under current American law it's only fraud if you've lied to get money.
If you lie to get absolute power over America, it's perfectly legitimate.
And I'm saying that's a BAD FUCKING IDEA.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
If the First Amendment protects the right to turn an election by fraud, we're fucked.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Wordle 1,112 4/6
β¬β¬π©β¬π©
β¬β¬π©π©π©
β¬π©π©π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
There is nothing more British than this.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Kris Overstreet
Okay, here's what I said:
"So you're going to destroy the planet with record breaking electricity consumption to replace creative humans and steal their intellectual property?!"
Please share. #GenAI
survey.adobe.com/jfe/form/SV_...