|
LouieTheRed@louiethered.bsky.social |
Bishop's going to take an axe to accommodation supplements as "it is a costly form of housing support"
1st up, those receiving the accommodation supplement etc, (not just beneficiaries) who have boarders to help make ends meet. There's been no media reports on this
www.msd.govt.nz/documents/ab...
5 replies 6 reposts 18 likes
|
Mask Up Comments and Opinions
@commentsandopi2.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Dumping on those with the least as usual. Guess they're consistent
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
NinjaKitty
@ninjakitty.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That’s going to piss off a lot of landlords who are the direct recipients of said supplements
4 replies 1 reposts 12 likes
|
Simon O'Neill
@sjponeill.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Hopefully late 2026, when we are shed of this Koalition of Klowns, and can right its many many wrongs...
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Chris Miller
@thelittlepakeha.bsky.social
[ View ] |
a lot of things are costly! bills are costly, that doesn't mean we just stop paying them.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Tom V
@tomwv.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I'd love to see the accommodation supplement go (with the proviso that it is replaced with an alternative way of making housing affordable, which won't be what this govt does), because it's currently a firehouse of government cash straight into landlords pockets and keeps rents high
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes