|
Matt Steinglass@mattsteinglass.bsky.social |
Yes, but both before and after Trump v US the interrogator could be prosecuted and the president would have to pardon them. Not sure how relevant this is—that avenue of lawlessness has always been open.
2 replies 1 reposts 21 likes
|
The Next Day
@incompetusrex.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Have to? Such a president would promise it to ensure his order was followed.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
b-boy bouiebaisse
@jbouie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
it is relevant inasmuch that even a prosecution of the interrogator may want to bring evidence of illegal intent from the white house
3 replies 3 reposts 91 likes