Sure. Who knows. I don’t think Kamala is a great candidate. But at this point it’s foolhardy to pretend Biden can just tough things out. Politics isn’t football: in politics perception *is* reality. The surge of optimism that accompanies that switch to the backup becomes its own actual momentum.
4 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
2 hours ago on the street in Brooklyn a Democratic activist asked me and my family whether we’d prefer Biden or Harris. He was doing the survey on his own just to get a sense of things. He’d asked about 400 people and 2/3 now preferred Harris. This is real; it’s not hallucination.
3 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Absolutely! But I don’t think the effort to get Biden to stand down because he’s a weak candidate is a “ratfuck”. People are rightly concerned that he could lose an election which Kamala or another younger candidate would win.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
Just a jaw-dropper from the state whose attorney general is currently trying to execute an innocent man.
innocenceproject.org/missouri-cir...
25 replies
397 reposts
1106 likes
Of course you or I’d vote for Biden over Trump. But it is really clear that a lot of people unlike us who would otherwise be probable Biden votes are hesitant or swinging the other way because of his age-related decline. Politics demands assessing how other people unlike oneself think.
4 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
I keep seeing people on this site say the most absurd nonsense about neurotypical people. Think of a human state of being. That state of being is experienced by neurotypical people. Nothing human is strange to me, as the line goes.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
That is a terribly confused misperception, and I wish people would stop saying this sort of thing. I know very few people who do not experience self-doubt; the overwhelming majority are neurotypical, as the word “typical” suggests.
2 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
In what sense is a lack of self-doubt neurotypical?
2 replies
0 reposts
18 likes
Well, hopefully we’ll see.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I can go back and take a look at the coverage, but I was looking hard at the time and was disappointed. She had plenty of people rooting for her and she couldn’t figure out what she wanted to do.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
None of that is disqualifying under current circumstances though.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I don’t really think that holds up. Biden didn’t win but he was clearly doing effective politics: hunting for winning issues, charming, pandering. Kamala revealed a crippling inability to find a voice and a dependence on bickering advisers.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
She was a pretty bad candidate during the 2020 primaries.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yes, but both before and after Trump v US the interrogator could be prosecuted and the president would have to pardon them. Not sure how relevant this is—that avenue of lawlessness has always been open.
2 replies
1 reposts
21 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
From April 👇👇👇
0 replies
13 reposts
39 likes
This ought to feel like a reassuring article. Democrats willing to say “yes he’s old but we need to stop Trump” will also say “no Kamala isn’t a good politician but we need to stop Trump”, and those saying “he’s too old” would probably fall into line and back her too.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
When Nate Silver just sticks to discussing polls he’s perfectly reasonable. These points are quite persuasive. His proposed solution is dumb though www.nytimes.com/2024/07/03/o...
3 replies
3 reposts
15 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
“The rabbits got the gun now” coming from a lawyer for a crooked Governor going after a newspaper writer is such a telling comment about how much we’ve let powerful people cast themselves as victims and it goes from this to Elon to Trump and everywhere else
13 replies
233 reposts
763 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
i was just going to make a post about this. if trump decides you are an enemy of the state or a “threat to national security” and has you deported, citizenship or not, there’s nothing you can do to get home. he has full legal power to render you stateless.
31 replies
397 reposts
1210 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
The more you read yesterday’s immunity decision, the more appalling it gets. My take:
www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/o...
26 replies
261 reposts
968 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
Happy Fourth of July from the Supreme Court! wapo.st/3xEpj4E
7 replies
63 reposts
216 likes
I think this has always been the case. The claims about King George’s tyranny used to mobilize Americans to rebel were mostly absurd hyperbole
1 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
As a future president of the United States, I am using the same principle as Trump is claiming re: porn star hush money to assert immunity for all felonies I commit in order to win election, starting with robbing banks to amass campaign funds
0 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
Americanists and lawyers ask, what does the Constitution say? Comparativists ask, who controls the High Court, the militia, and the clerics?
7 replies
117 reposts
475 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
Beware the temptation to downplay the SCOTUS ruling and to deny its potential implications. We've been down this road before.
8 replies
102 reposts
409 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
19 replies
900 reposts
2790 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
My first read: If a president commits crimes unrelated to him being the most powerful person in the world, he can be prosecuted. But if explicitly uses his powers to commit crimes, he is at least presumptively, and probably absolutely immune from prosecution.
I mean, holy shit.
28 replies
218 reposts
938 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
/8 At any rate, congratulations to the Federalist Society for an achievement beyond the reach of the British, outside the grasp of bloody civil war, impossible to Nazis and Soviets and terrorists: defeating the American idea.
40 replies
894 reposts
2787 likes
I remain slightly surprised that we have devolved back to this extraordinarily stupid form of nativism, which has no theory of morality, history or the world apart from “my tribe good, your tribe bad”.
1 replies
2 reposts
24 likes
Since Trump and the alt-right takeover of the GOP xenophobia is now based on the claim that immigrants are trying to “replace” us. There’s no longer even a claim that they plan to do something; their presence itself is the offense. Immigrants are now intrinsically bad because of who they are.
2 replies
8 reposts
30 likes
During the Bush administration people used to justify xenophobia with claims that Muslims were ideologically alien, plotting terrorist attacks, bringing sharia law etc. These claims were insane but they were based on a paranoid vision of what Muslims were going to *do*.
1 replies
3 reposts
19 likes
My favorite moving walkway in Detroit youtu.be/dv8MBnBHdGs?...
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I’m kind of surprised it doesn’t seem to be linked to the Light Tunnel at Detroit International Airport, which tripped me out when I passed through a few years back youtu.be/dv8MBnBHdGs?...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This isn’t going to happen, and might not work anyway, but it is where we stand I’m afraid.
www.economist.com/leaders/2024...
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
You hear our war is "not THAT bad", we're getting so much cash (very outdated equipment actually), our president is just begging everyone for money and we should just shut up altogether.
Meanwhile this literally just happened a few hours ago. In a peaceful city away from the front line. Look.
1 replies
18 reposts
50 likes
Reposted by Matt Steinglass
I’m not sure there’s anything you can say about a society that wants to protect kids from Anne Frank’s Diary but won’t protect them from guns.
70 replies
806 reposts
2370 likes
Sure, but that's an argument about optics and political considerations. If there's no technical reason why those delegates have to commit their votes one way or another, they're going to go all over the place once the question is thrown open, and then it becomes a contest.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
This is a really good speech and a great campaign theme for this moment. www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xN-...
2 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Don't you need to factor in, as counterpoint, the fact that an incarnation of the liberal order looks set to win 450+ seats in Parliament next week?
3 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I think even if the VP were officially chosen, if the nominee steps down during the campaign there's no rule that the VP replaces them.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
If Biden steps down, I think there would be a huge political fight over who replaces him. It wouldn't automatically be Kamala. The question is whether that fight would be good for the party's chances at winning.
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
Stephen, I regret my ignorance but having read this, I think my assumption was completely wrong. If Biden withdraws, a brokered convention becomes inevitable: there's no mechanism designating Kamala and no reason to think his delegates would automatically back her. www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Frankly I don’t know what the technical aspects of Kamala becoming the nominee would be, either. She wasn’t a candidate in the presidential primaries obviously. Is there a rule about what happens as the default if the president drops his campaign? Does he get to pick who his delegates go to?
3 replies
0 reposts
0 likes