|
Max Kennerly@maxkennerly.bsky.social |
People like Fallon start from the premise, "Can I imagine some explanation in which this thing, standing alone, can be fitted into a principled legal system?" I mean, yeah, sure, that can be done for anything. But doing so makes you a collaborator and a propagandist, not an honest & wise scholar.
9 replies 21 reposts 170 likes
|
Adam Bonin
@adambonin.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What if -- now this may seem crazy -- the courts are stacked with people loyal to that same President?
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Jonathan Pierce
@jonathanpierce.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Even Jimmy Fallon would know better.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Dag.
@3fecta.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Member of the Federalist Society. Here is my shocked face.
0 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
Cloud's Strife
@jmgreene28.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Why doesn’t Evan Gershkovich simply petition to be released? Is he stupid?
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Wudang96 💜🌻
@wudang96.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We don't have to imagine what can happen when a person with power decides he is going to do whatever he wants and to bad (or out the window) for those who object. And no, an unjust "court system" isn't the answer. That's another fiction invented by money to protect money.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Pete Davidson
@petedavidsonny.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thank you. No sense in searching for answers that upset us less than the reality we all face. Ditch the silver linings playbook. Sobriety is an absolute must right now.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Edward Carney
@ecarney.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It doesn't even seem like they're describing a principled legal system, so much as an incoherent legal system that still magically upholds principles because every agent of the court is inherently trustworthy and moral.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Chase Burke
@cburke.bsky.social
[ View ] |
While on your helicopter ride, see if one of the masked executioners has the proper forms and a pen you can borrow.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
WasteLandRover
@wastelandrover.bsky.social
[ View ] |
BUT YOU WOULD NOT HAVE ANY EVIDENCE TO PROVE YOUR CASE BECAUSE THE SC HAS DETERMINED THAT PRETTY MUCH ANY EVIDENCE YOU COULD USE WOULD BE INADMISSIBLE
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes