|
Michael Podhorzer@mikepod.bsky.social |
Alito and Thomas have made clear their insurrectionist connections. So why are we debating whether Alito should recuse himself, instead of demanding Roberts dismiss Trump’s immunity appeal so the J6 trial can begin immediately? (It should be “dismissed as improvidently granted.")
6 replies 118 reposts 413 likes
|
ddouglas 💎 🇺🇦 🦋
@dd9000.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Because Roberts is only 1 vote, and he is one of the six insurrectionists.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Michael Podhorzer
@mikepod.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s long past time we acknowledge and reckon with the following: 1) But for Alito and his similarly conflicted fellow justices, Donald Trump would almost certainly be a convicted felon for J6 by now.
1 replies 23 reposts 108 likes
|
John Kastellec
@jkastellec.bsky.social
[ View ] |
A DIG takes 5 votes; the CJ can't do it unilaterally.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
the murderHobos! (the band)
@the-murderhobos.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We are all slaves: bought and sold by the children of the masters of old.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@napoleon-the-pig.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Maybe because Robert's doesn't have the authority to do that, so it would be void
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
jody
@jodyshenn.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Did these guys tell Roberts any of this before he had to do his votes? You’d think he’d have some self-respect at some point.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes