|
Mike Masnick@mmasnick.bsky.social |
Need to read more closely but, it looks like the court did not destroy the internet today with the NetChoice decision. They may have actually gotten it right? More analysis later.
5 replies 10 reposts 104 likes
|
Chair of the Sewer Maintenance Board
@sidewalkslam.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think it'd be easy for the court to say "no you cannot ban speech on the internet what the fuck" but I'll take punting I guess
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Dag.
@3fecta.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Punting it appears. Sending it back on procedural grounds.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Alan Fisher
@amfisher.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow."
1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Lizard
@lizardky.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I just skimmed it, but it seems they're saying "You idiots didn't consider the 1A implications, like, OF COURSE there are 1A implications, do it over again and remember that!"
2 replies 1 reposts 11 likes
|
AJL
@guiltypanacea.bsky.social
[ View ] |
From the syllabus, this looks like a refreshingly good decision
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes