|
Nicholas Slayton@nslayton.bsky.social |
Wait but isn't that for crimes he did BEFORE he was president?
4 replies 1 reposts 26 likes
|
Nicholas Slayton@nslayton.bsky.social |
Wait but isn't that for crimes he did BEFORE he was president?
4 replies 1 reposts 26 likes
|
NutMeg
@casuallychaotic.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He's also using it for crimes he commited after he was president too, so I don't think he thinks the exact timing of the crimes matters, just as long as he remains immune to any and all consequences for all his actions.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
state song thread guy
@statesongxprt.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You think the Supreme Court can't overturn the concept of linear time? Just watch them
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Chrisby
@chrisbyc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He also wrote personal checks. Surely not an official act.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Aubrey Gilleran
@aubreygilleran.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Their argument is that the prosecution partially relied on things he did while president as evidence, and that might now be inadmissible due to Trump v. U.S.
2 replies 1 reposts 20 likes