Polling evidence can’t tell you the future. And I think that’s what a lot of people crave. And it could be that literally no Democrat could beat Trump because people are angry about burger prices and car juice. But if age is the crucial factor, it’s the easiest one to solve with a younger candidate.
It is not Pessimistic or Unrealistic or anything to say that if the Republicans win in November the chances of HRT being outlawed for trans people entirely across the country is basically guaranteed
And even it they lose, if nothing is done about The Supreme Court then it's still on the table
Now up: my thoughts on Trump v. U.S. In my view the Court majority went much too far in creating a zone of formal and practical presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. "This is not what the Framers wanted. It is not what we should want either." www.cato.org/blog/court-w...
I will hold the NYT in contempt for their coverage but it’s also a campaign’s job to push back on media narratives and create narratives of their own. Sulzberger wasn’t wrong when he said they can’t expect his paper to be part of the campaign.
If you can’t reassure Nancy Pelosi enough to get her to say something non-ambiguous (the president still hasn’t called her!), then it becomes a campaign issue, not just a media issue. Playing the media is part of comms.
“Joe had a bad night, but he’s still our guy, now let’s talk about Trump’s fascism” should have been the unified message, repeated constantly, and that kind of coordination needed to come from the campaign within hours. Instead, we were left with scattered statements, some ambiguous.
Desegregation is being unraveled. Separate but “equal” is being reestablished. We can be defensive, or we can step up and ask for more than the preservation of the status quo.
At the bare minimum, it shows he can’t get on the phone with his own damn party and tell them to stay on message, which just furthers the impression that he’s not fit enough to be behind the wheel.
The problem, unfortunately, is a lot of Democratic donors and Members of Congress really take the NYT/Siena poll seriously. Cohn himself has warned them about making big political decisions based on his polls, but it doesn't matter. This might just further the panic.
An election where a lot of people say they hate both candidates is one that will likely see a huge dropoff from 2020's historically high turnout. A lot of folks don't seem to be factoring that in.
“Politics would be interesting again,” no politics should not be interesting, normal people should not have to invest time and energy into saving democracy because our institutions are collapsing, give me boring, mundane politics any day
Right. He was so dominant as AG (didn't even get a GOP opponent once) that he turned down multiple opportunities and attempts to recruit him to run for governor and U.S. Senate. He ran against McCrory when he smelled blood.
Did they vote in this year's primary? Or in 2022? I know there are some first-time voters in every election, but I really do think you need a track record to be LV.
If Harris/Cooper and and won, Cooper's term as governor would end on December 31, 2024, anyway, and either Robinson or Stein would be sworn in on January 1, 2025.
Not sure what you mean. I'm only offering Cooper as a suggestion if Harris runs while Biden remains in the White House. She obviously can't ask him to leave office before 2025, or we'd get Robinson.
Yeah, it's only relatively recently that former VPs were seen as "presumptive nominees." They used to just be plain types who wouldn't hurt the ticket and might offer some help in one region or another. Cooper fits that bill. He'd be a placeholder.
I don't think Cooper would run for president. Beshear might. So that offers the difference between the two. But then we're looking at 2032 at the earliest, so I wouldn't game it out that far.
Mitch McConnell offers an object lesson for all the Republicans who think they can tame this tiger -- even if you do everything in your power to advance Trump's agenda and sabotage two different impeachment trials that would remove him, the Felon Messiah King will still demand your head.
TBF, they show that he has fully and completely consolidated conservative and Republican support, which is good. He's going to get 47-49% of the national popular vote no matter what. It'll all come down to how undecided voters view him.
I feel like if you're going to make that pitch, you need to step aside for her, but it seems like a lot of insiders and outsiders have a hard time trusting her.
If this is true, it's going to be very, very hard for any candidate, even the perfect one pundits have in their mind, to overcome. Because it's arguable that Trump has the incumbency advantage here because voters, for some reason, remember his term as good times.
I mean, if you believe polling, there's a real sense that voters thing *Trump* is uniquely competent and good with the economy (and is also socially moderate), while they also hate the GOP as a whole.
the fact that the same people pushing Biden to drop out immediately are also proposing shit that wouldn't fly on The West Wing makes me think we need a complete and total shutdown of the nation's op-ed pages until we can figure out what's going on
the difference been pundits who have spent too much time huffing gasoline and journalists who are actually thinking through this with seriousness is whether they think having a contentious, brokered convention is less problematic than just going with biden's elected successor.
Even when Pelosi went on TV to defend him and try to redirect back onto Trump's (very real) impairments, she had to admit that she hadn't spoken with Biden since the debate, and it had been a week. 2/2
Ideally, you'd have gotten, "I talked to Biden just last week. That's not the guy I saw up there. He was exhausted from travel and a cold" would have been an easy talking point. But they aren't making it because (by all accounts), he has been insular both before and after. 1/