southpaw's avatar

southpaw

@nycsouthpaw.bsky.social

From Jackson’s dissent. I believe the way this works in combination with Loper-Bright is really insidious, but ofc it’s not gonna get the headlines.

10 replies 50 reposts 165 likes


Isaac Erbele's avatar Isaac Erbele @isaacerbele.bsky.social
[ View ]

For Loper and Corner to work, won't it necessarily require expansion of the judiciary?

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jim Teeth's avatar Jim Teeth @drjamesjteeth.bsky.social
[ View ]

Don’t like a 20-year old regulation? Spin up a shell corporation in that business and sue.

3 replies 14 reposts 124 likes


Adam Vann's avatar Adam Vann @adamvann.bsky.social
[ View ]

Quite a big giveaway to law firms and particularly administrative attorneys too. OTOH, I'd love to see NRDC and Earthjustice take advantage of this as well, and they should be able to do so. I hope they're fundraising off this stuff

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


southpaw's avatar southpaw @nycsouthpaw.bsky.social
[ View ]

2nd up is Netchoice—the judgments are unanimously vacated and sent back. Kagan writes with 6 joiners (though Jackson skips a few parts). Several conservatives pen concurrences in the judgment. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...

1 replies 2 reposts 43 likes


Norbizness's avatar Norbizness @norbizness.bsky.social
[ View ]

That adverb modifying dissent (respectfully) probably needs to disappear. It's official, my law school education has been rendered useless (just in time for early retirement)

1 replies 1 reposts 5 likes


Lawtalkinguy 's avatar Lawtalkinguy @lawtalkinguy.bsky.social
[ View ]

I know it wouldn't mean much, but I wish they would stop including "respectfully" because there is nothing about this majority that deserves the slightest bit of respect.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Spencer M Ross's avatar Spencer M Ross @srossmktg.com
[ View ]

Sadly I'm not a headline-creator... bsky.app/profile/sros...

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


surrealization.bsky.social's avatar surrealization.bsky.social @surrealization.bsky.social
[ View ]

“Nothing’s ever over.” This has been the de facto cry of the anti-Roe forces for 50 years, and now they’ve extended it to every administrative rule ever. Chaos.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Mist's avatar Mist @mistuhbull.bsky.social
[ View ]

How to destroy the regulatory state in 3 easy steps 1. Start up a new business 2. Sue over literally any regulation in a conservative district 3. Court no longer has to defer to agency interpretation, regulation struck down

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


's avatar @unorlis.bsky.social
[ View ]

So what exactly does this do? Am slightly confused

3 replies 0 reposts 0 likes