ManhattanJuryAppreciator 's avatar

ManhattanJuryAppreciator

@ratelimitexceeder.bsky.social

One thing I think the pro-crowd AI crowd doesn’t understand is that actual writers enjoy the act of writing. They don’t find it tedious, they *like* solving the problems it entails.

15 replies 146 reposts 535 likes


Una vez más 's avatar Una vez más @unavezms8.bsky.social
[ View ]

I'd argue that for many people the process of writing is more important that the result.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Corey Rayburn Yung's avatar Corey Rayburn Yung @coreyryung.bsky.social
[ View ]

The only screenwriters who like using AI for writing are aspiring executives.

0 replies 1 reposts 10 likes


Stephen R. Smith's avatar Stephen R. Smith @stephensmith.bsky.social
[ View ]

Anyone who’s enjoyed something because it was hard, and then had the joy sucked out of it because they could pay to win should realize that challenge is the joy of the thing, and having anyone or anything take that away from you ruins the thing. I want to write, not push a button to have writing.

1 replies 0 reposts 8 likes


Riff Conner's avatar Riff Conner @rifflesby.bsky.social
[ View ]

What do you mean nobody wants to buy my automatic jigsaw puzzle-assembling machine

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Will “Looking for a job” Smith's avatar Will “Looking for a job” Smith @willsmith.fun
[ View ]

Vince Gilligan explicitly said this in interviews around the end of Breaking Bad. Paraphrasing, but he said they’d intentionally write themselves into corners and the end of episodes because the challenge of finding their way out was what was fun and made the show good.

1 replies 3 reposts 55 likes


Kevin Riggle's avatar Kevin Riggle @kevinriggle.bsky.social
[ View ]

Or at least we need to solve it, and won’t accept anyone else’s. Art is choices, mine or someone else’s, and I’d rather mine

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Bonnie Edwards's avatar Bonnie Edwards @bonnieedwards.bsky.social
[ View ]

I’m teaching a class tomorrow on the nuts and bolts of storytelling.AI is shit and will never get it

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Ashley Lynch ✂️🎞️'s avatar Ashley Lynch ✂️🎞️ @ashleylynch.bsky.social
[ View ]

The most true thing I read someone say is “I need AI to do the dishes and laundry so I can write more, not do my writing so I can do more dishes and laundry.”

1 replies 18 reposts 82 likes


wembley's avatar wembley @bananashirt.bsky.social
[ View ]

speaking for myself, i can find it tedious, nerve wracking, upsetting. but also fun, challenging, interesting. i could see ways AI could be used as a tool or helper. but if it does the whole thing for you, what's the point? it feels like cheating

0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Girl-Starved Beast's avatar Girl-Starved Beast @julesprom.bsky.social
[ View ]

they fundamentally dont think storytelling does or should mean anything

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Linguiça May Alcott🇺🇦's avatar Linguiça May Alcott🇺🇦 @silkscreenfiend.bsky.social
[ View ]

But fucking how is AI going to fucking do anything to help writers? It just isn't how writing works! Writing is universally about "why," the one thing that AI fundamentally has no concept of (to the extent it has a concept of anything).

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


robertus's avatar robertus @robertus.bsky.social
[ View ]

I mean hell I will go back and re-draft *work emails* because I enjoy doing so. I do not want an LLM to try to write it for me, are you kidding?

1 replies 0 reposts 9 likes


John Harrold's avatar John Harrold @abumirchi.com
[ View ]

I think this is largely true of many fields that folks are trying to replace with AI. Like I do modeling and simulation, and that involves a lot of programming. I enjoy that process. Listening to music and focusing on the flow of the analysis, the data involved, abstracting things out, etc.

0 replies 0 reposts 8 likes


Stephanie Cheney's avatar Stephanie Cheney @slcheneypr.bsky.social
[ View ]

Exactly

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Charles EP Murphy's avatar Charles EP Murphy @cepmurphy.bsky.social
[ View ]

And even where a writer bombs at it, that can be something _interesting_ in the failure. There could be something about the writer or the context they were working in there. What's interesting in an algorithm half-assing it? They were only interesting when they were spouting gibberish

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes