|
Ned Resnikoff@resnikoff.bsky.social |
On the same morning, the Court said: 1) We should not presume to know more than small town mayors regarding complex, technical questions like whether to arrest people for being poor. 2) I don't see why a "PhD" in "nuclear physics" should have any latitude to implement ambiguous energy rules.
6 replies 249 reposts 677 likes
|
Timothy Noah
@timothynoah.bsky.social
[ View ] |
libertiesjournal.com/articles/a-p...
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Globulous Gutgurgle
@inmediasrage.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The new constitutional order looks a lot like making Red states/governments baronies and Blue states/governments fiefdoms
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
@surfingthepast.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I say if the court is going to have the expertise to regulate nuclear materials or chemical toxins they let them taste samples of them in court before they rule. Only way to be sure
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
mamday (they/them)
@mamday.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It is also my lived experience people do not seem too impressed by my PhD in nuclear physics but do really hate homeless people
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Flopsie
@flopsie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
When there is a choice on a complex issue, I prefer to pick the ruling that is more fascist- John Roberts
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@anna9.bsky.social
[ View ] |
1) democratically elected 2) not democratically elected, should resolve fact-bound questions but not what a statute means (see decision)
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes