|
@russms.bsky.social |
I hate this court so much and even I am astonished by this case. It writes new provisions into Art 2 of the constitution that were unnecessary to decide the case at hand and that cannot be repealed by legislative action or even undone without a new case of presidential law breaking before the court
5 replies 52 reposts 330 likes
|
Steph Scythes
@stephscythes.bsky.social
[ View ] |
🔥🇺🇸🔥 In the face of Monday's #treasonous #SCOTUS' presidential immunity ruling, this #July4th #IndependenceDay is MUCH diminished. We have a new monarch called the "President." King George III must be 🤣🤣🤣 laughing his ass off in his grave. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 Steph
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@russms.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Six people did the thing that is supposed to require 2/3 of both chambers of Congress and 3/4 of the states to do
9 replies 137 reposts 676 likes
|
BRAK AND BLUE
@yinkadoubledare.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Rebalance the court and have them sua sponte revisit it. They basically make their own rules anyway, nothing to stop them from doing it other than tradition, and the FedSoc bloc doesn't pay any attention to that stuff anyway if it stands in the way of what they want.
1 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
redstormpopcorn
@wasteof.technology
[ View ] |
Just any kind of law breaking? Could Joe go run a stop sign tomorrow and kick off some litigation? :V
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@rst.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The Court has never, in the past, reopened cases and revisited its own prior rulings sua sponte. But it's never done a lot of things that seem to be happening right now. And Congress could arrange to request reconsideration if they wanted to, at least as legitimately as... whatever *this* is.
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes